On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 08:39:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:36:10AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 04:21:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:Could you please update this tree:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.35.y.git ?
No, the "stable" trees are not being updated anymore, they have moved to
the longterm git directory instead.
It would be good if the old stable git tree for 2.6.35 was deleted to avoid
confusion. Greg, what do you think?
No, we have never deleted any of the other trees when we "stopped"
maintaining them, so we shouldn't delete these either.
I need to look this week at using git notes to mark trees as unsupported
or supported in a way that will work well. That should solve this issue
as the note could also say 'go look at the longterm kernel' as well.
Once again, I think it's not too late to replace the old trees with a
symlink to the new one (or the opposite), considering that users have
not updated their scripts yet. Also I'm realizing it's a bit bothering
as a user to have to change the address of the remote when tracking such
a branch.