Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: Fix recursive Kconfig dependency

[Peter HÃwe]

Am Freitag 17 Dezember 2010, 12:30:15 schrieb Sedat Dilek:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Peter HÃwe <PeterHuewe@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch 15 Dezember 2010, 21:51:04 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> >> > Hi, another patch was posted before:
> >> > 
> >> > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.platform.x86.devel/970/ma
> >> > tch =acpi_wmi
> >> >Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Yeah, you're right - but as Sedat's patch is perfect (and fixes both) -
> > so for Sedats's patch:
> > Acked-by: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@xxxxxx>
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Peter
> 
> [ CC John Linville ]
> 
> It's a bit disappointing to see my fix is still not in
> platform-drivers-x86/linux-next [1] (even it's only fixing "warnings",
> 9 days past).
> linux-next tree is for me a very high dynamic SCM tree, I am doing
> mostly daily builds, at weekend I am testing/pulling other trees
> before they go into Monday's linux-next.
> As far as I have fun with "my process"... I will continue.



Added Stephen Rothwell on CC, maybe he can apply it directly to linux-next ;)

Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/