Re: [concept & "good taste" review] persistent store

[Tony Luck]

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Yes, this was exactly what I was trying to say! Do something in a
> watchdog handler path that shows that we actually made progress. But
> you're right, we'd still need the notification. My look at "did we make
> a progress" was too simple and there _are_ nuances which need to be
> accounted for.

My view of the notification is:
1) Oops happens, gets written to persistent store.
2) fs/pstore code makes a file appear in /dev/pstore
3) Daemon that's watching /dev/pstore sees new file
4) File is read, copied some place safe and fsync'd
5) Daemon unlinks file from /dev/pstore
6) fs/pstore code tells platform level to erase record

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/