Re: [PATCH] Prevent users from disabling tickless

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Wednesday, December 22, 2010, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> Disabling NO_HZ has a serious negative effect on performance -- an extra
> 70us per I/O.  Prevent users from deselecting it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

OTOH, it causes some systems to not work at all still.  Sadly.

Thanks,
Rafael


> diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> index f06a8a3..55b9a04 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> @@ -5,13 +5,9 @@ config TICK_ONESHOT
>  	bool
>  
>  config NO_HZ
> -	bool "Tickless System (Dynamic Ticks)"
> +	def_bool y
>  	depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET && GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
>  	select TICK_ONESHOT
> -	help
> -	  This option enables a tickless system: timer interrupts will
> -	  only trigger on an as-needed basis both when the system is
> -	  busy and when the system is idle.
>  
>  config HIGH_RES_TIMERS
>  	bool "High Resolution Timer Support"
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/