Re: [PATCH 1/4] net: phy: balance disable/enable irq on change

[David Miller]

From: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 11:58:48 +0100

> When phy interface changes its status, it calls phy_change() function.
> This function calls the interrupt disabling functions for the driver
> registered, but if this driver doesn't implement it, there is no IRQ
> disabling. After doing the work, we call enable_irq and not the
> respective driver function. This fixes it, as it could lead to an
> unbalanced IRQ. Error code changed to EOPNOTSUPP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Michel Hautbois <jhautbois@xxxxxxxxx>

This is completely bogus.

First of all, there are 5 call sites for phy_change_interrupt() but
you've only implemented the new semantics for two of those.

Therefore, if we even wanted this, we should implement the behavior in
phy_change_interrupt() itself instead of duplicating the logic at
each and every call site.

But we don't want this.

It's not appropriate at all.  If a device lacks a way to turn
interrupt off and on, using disable_irq() and enable_irq() is not
necessarily correct.

If the interrupt line is shared, for example, this will break
everything.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/