[34-longterm 234/260] KVM: MMU: fix conflict access permissions in direct sp
From: Paul Gortmaker
Date: Sun Jan 02 2011 - 02:33:46 EST
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 5fd5387c89ec99ff6cb82d2477ffeb7211b781c2 upstream.
In no-direct mapping, we mark sp is 'direct' when we mapping the
guest's larger page, but its access is encoded form upper page-struct
entire not include the last mapping, it will cause access conflict.
For example, have this mapping:
[W]
/ PDE1 -> |---|
P[W] | | LPA
\ PDE2 -> |---|
[R]
P have two children, PDE1 and PDE2, both PDE1 and PDE2 mapping the
same lage page(LPA). The P's access is WR, PDE1's access is WR,
PDE2's access is RO(just consider read-write permissions here)
When guest access PDE1, we will create a direct sp for LPA, the sp's
access is from P, is W, then we will mark the ptes is W in this sp.
Then, guest access PDE2, we will find LPA's shadow page, is the same as
PDE's, and mark the ptes is RO.
So, if guest access PDE1, the incorrect #PF is occured.
Fixed by encode the last mapping access into direct shadow page
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index a535c87..2bd2b3e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -356,6 +356,8 @@ static u64 *FNAME(fetch)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr,
direct = 1;
if (!is_dirty_gpte(gw->ptes[level - delta]))
access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
+ access &= gw->pte_access;
+
table_gfn = gpte_to_gfn(gw->ptes[level - delta]);
/* advance table_gfn when emulating 1gb pages with 4k */
if (delta == 0)
--
1.7.3.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/