Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol

From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Mon Jan 03 2011 - 05:40:17 EST


Le lundi 03 janvier 2011 Ã 10:54 +0100, Stefani Seibold a Ãcrit :

> How can you do a routing, how can you determinate the MTU of the route.
> This are basics. Look into other code how this things will be handled is
> in my opinion the right way, since there a no function provide to do
> this.
>

Hmm, how user land can perform this task then ?

Is there an open source implementation of UDPCP ?

What are its problems ? You say its dog slow, I really wonder why.
UDP stack is pretty scalable these days, yet some improvements are
possible.

Why not adding generic helpers if you believe you miss some
infrastructure ? This could benefit to other 'stacks' as well.

> Otherwise you can say the same about all the filesystem or PCI
> drvivers , which do also a lot in the same way. But since this is the
> way to do it, it is the right way.
>

These drivers are here because of high performance on top of high
performance specs.

While UDPCP is only a layer above UDP. If the problem comes from UDP
being too slow, it'll be slow too.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/