Re: [PATCH 10/32] input/tps6507x-ts: use system_wq instead of dedicatedworkqueue
From: Todd Fischer
Date: Mon Jan 03 2011 - 11:34:54 EST
Hi Dan,
Polling is only necessary because I was given brain dead hardware. I
was expecting updated hardware with the interrupt signal connected
properly, but haven't received it yet.
Any reasonable hardware will not need tps6507x-ts polling. I was under
the impression I could only push patches that I have tested. Since I
haven't tested an interrupt version of the driver, I didn't include a
patch that removes the polling and replaces it with interrupts.
I have another customer planning on using the TPS6507x chip for touch
screen. I expect their hardware in around 3 weeks.
Todd
On 01/03/2011 07:39 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 02:49:33PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
With cmwq, there's no reason to use a separate workqueue. Drop
tps6507x_ts->wq and use system_wq instead.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo<tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov<dmitry.torokhov@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-input@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Dan Carpenter<error27@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Todd Fischer<todd.fischer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Only compile tested. Please feel free to take it into the subsystem
tree or simply ack - I'll route it through the wq tree.
This is that driver that polls every 30 ms. :/ Todd, is there no way
to avoid this? What was the status on that?
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/