Re: [GIT PULL||RFC 00/11] perf library and regression testingimprovements

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Tue Jan 04 2011 - 09:20:22 EST


Em Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:09:08PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> Arnaldo,
> Looks like what's wrong is not ps but count:
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> [Switching to Thread 0x7f96967fd6e0 (LWP 5156)]
> 0x0000000000412b58 in read_counter_aggr (counter=0x7d4820) at builtin-stat.c:206
> 206 update_stats(&ps->res_stats[i], count[i]);
> (gdb) print ps
> $1 = (struct perf_stat *) 0x7d48a0
> (gdb) print *ps
> $2 = {res_stats = {{n = 0, mean = 0, M2 = 0}, {n = 0, mean = 0, M2 =
> 0}, {n = 0, mean = 0, M2 = 0}}}
> (gdb) print count
> $3 = (u64 *) 0x12
> (gdb) print *count
> Cannot access memory at address 0x12
> (gdb) print count
> $4 = (u64 *) 0x12

Count is:

u64 *count = counter->counts->aggr.values;

And counter->counts type is:

struct perf_counts_values {
union {
struct {
u64 val;
u64 ena;
u64 run;
};
u64 values[3];
};
};

struct perf_counts {
s8 scaled;
struct perf_counts_values aggr;
struct perf_counts_values cpu[];
};

So for counter->counts->aggr.values to be 0x12 counter->counts must be
NULL...

>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Em Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 02:59:00PM +0100, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> >> Arnaldo,
> >>
> >> The version of perf at tip-x86 commit 9274b36, segfaults for me:
> >>
> >> $ gdb perf
> >> (gdb) r stat date
> >>
> >> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> >> [Switching to Thread 0x7fdc602eb6e0 (LWP 4590)]
> >> cmd_stat (argc=1, argv=0x7fff6fa2a9f0, prefix=<value optimized out>)
> >> at builtin-stat.c:206
> >> 206                   update_stats(&ps->res_stats[i], count[i]);
> >> (gdb) bt
> >> #0  cmd_stat (argc=1, argv=0x7fff6fa2a9f0, prefix=<value optimized
> >> out>) at builtin-stat.c:206
> >> #1  0x0000000000405c8b in handle_internal_command (argc=2,
> >> argv=0x7fff6fa2a9f0) at perf.c:286
> >> #2  0x00000000004060b0 in main (argc=2, argv=0x7fff6fa2a680) at perf.c:403
> >>
> >> Most like ps is NULL.
> >
> > [acme@felicio linux]$ perf stat date | head -5
> > Tue Jan  4 12:03:05 BRST 2011
> >
> >  Performance counter stats for 'date':
> >
> >             4,525 cache-misses             #      7.640 M/sec
> >           343,171 cache-references         #    579.405 M/sec
> >            14,853 branch-misses            #      8.214 %
> >           180,833 branches                 #    305.316 M/sec
> >           897,837 instructions             #      0.000 IPC    (scaled from 67.67%)
> >     <not counted> cycles
> >               201 page-faults              #      0.339 M/sec
> >                 1 CPU-migrations           #      0.002 M/sec
> >                 1 context-switches         #      0.002 M/sec
> >          0.592282 task-clock-msecs         #      0.583 CPUs
> >
> >        0.001015291  seconds time elapsed
> >
> > [acme@felicio linux]$
> >
> > Re-reading the code now, thanks!
> >
> > - Arnaldo
> >
> >> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 8:16 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > * Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Ingo, Peter et al,
> >> >>
> >> >>       Trying to simplify using the API for tools and more specifically for
> >> >> 'perf test' regression tests, please take a look, perhaps starting from the last
> >> >> changeset, that implements a regression test using the resulting library API.
> >> >>
> >> >>       It also reduces the 'perf' tool footprint by not using hard coded array
> >> >> sizes, more need to be done, but should be a good start, one changeset shows a
> >> >> good reduction in BSS use.
> >> >>
> >> >>       Suggestions for naming most welcome, I thought about using "event__",
> >> >> but that is taken, "perf_event__", but thought it would clash with "event_t",
> >> >> so used the jargon used for the '-e' parameters: "Event Selector", but don't
> >> >> like it that much, what do you think?
> >> >>
> >> >>       Writing the first regression test I think there are more ways to simplify,
> >> >> on top of these, like not requiring a thread_map, i.e. passing NULL for that
> >> >> parameter would mean: self-monitor, etc.
> >> >>
> >> >>         If you are pleased as-is, please pull from:
> >> >>
> >> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux-2.6 perf/test
> >> >>
> >> >> Regards,
> >> >>
> >> >> - Arnaldo
> >> >>
> >> >> Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (11):
> >> >>   perf tools: Introduce event selectors
> >> >>   perf evsel: Adopt MATCH_EVENT macro from 'stat'
> >> >>   perf util: Move do_read from session to util
> >> >>   perf evsel: Delete the event selectors at exit
> >> >>   perf evsel: Steal the counter reading routines from stat
> >> >>   perf evsel: Introduce per cpu and per thread open helpers
> >> >>   perf tools: Refactor cpumap to hold nr and the map
> >> >>   perf tools: Refactor all_tids to hold nr and the map
> >> >>   perf evsel: Use {cpu,thread}_map to shorten list of parameters
> >> >>   perf evsel: Auto allocate resources needed for some methods
> >> >>   perf test: Add test for counting open syscalls
> >> >>
> >> >>  tools/perf/Makefile                |    4 +
> >> >>  tools/perf/builtin-record.c        |  152 +++++++--------
> >> >>  tools/perf/builtin-stat.c          |  368 +++++++++++++++---------------------
> >> >>  tools/perf/builtin-test.c          |   83 ++++++++
> >> >>  tools/perf/builtin-top.c           |  221 ++++++++++++----------
> >> >>  tools/perf/perf.c                  |    2 +
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/cpumap.c           |  123 +++++++++---
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/cpumap.h           |   10 +-
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/evsel.c            |  186 ++++++++++++++++++
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/evsel.h            |  115 +++++++++++
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/header.c           |   15 +-
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/header.h           |    3 +-
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.c     |   58 ++++--
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/parse-events.h     |   18 ++-
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/session.c          |   22 +--
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/session.h          |    1 -
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/thread.c           |   43 +++--
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/thread.h           |   15 ++-
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/trace-event-info.c |   30 ++--
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/trace-event.h      |    5 +-
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/util.c             |   17 ++
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/util.h             |    1 +
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/xyarray.c          |   20 ++
> >> >>  tools/perf/util/xyarray.h          |   20 ++
> >> >>  24 files changed, 1013 insertions(+), 519 deletions(-)
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/evsel.h
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/xyarray.c
> >> >>  create mode 100644 tools/perf/util/xyarray.h
> >> >
> >> > Pulled, thanks a lot Arnaldo!
> >> >
> >> >        Ingo
> >> >
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/