Re: [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line

[Martin Knoblauch]

----- Original Message ----

> From: Dan Carpenter <error27@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
>kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Tue, January 4, 2011 10:24:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line
> 
> On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:58:50PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Tue,  2011-01-04 at 08:59 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > +             WARN("put the && or || at the end  of the previous line\n" . 
>$herecurr);
> > 
> > I've submitted something  like this a couple of times and gotten
> > various objections but I think  it's sensible.
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/5/65
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/7/11/92
> 
> If everyone except you thinks  it's a waste of time, then stop asking me
> to redo my patches.  :/   I don't care either way so long as CodingStyle
> and checkpatch reflect the  rules.
> 

 The problem is that CodingStyle (here and elsewhere) is viewed a the holy-grail 
or at least natural-law by some. It should not. It is just about style/taste and 
that will never suit everybody. Insisting to much on style is just driving those 
away that:

a) just want to contribute content
b1) have their own style for decades
b2) detest uniformity

 For *me* the sensible thing is to keep "style" when you make small 
modifications/patches to existing stuff, but use whatever style is best for you 
when contributing new stuff.

 Anyway, I just wanted to say "Happy New Year" to Linux :-)

Cheers
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/