Re: still nfs problems [Was: Linux 2.6.37-rc8]

[James Bottomley]

On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:49 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 2011/1/5 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >>
> >> No, we really can't do that. Most of the time, the kmap() is the only
> >> way we access the page anyway, so flushing things would just be
> >> stupid. Why waste time and energy on doing something pointless?
> >
> > It's hardly pointless.  The kmap sets up an inequivalent alias in the
> > cache.
> 
> NO IT DOES NOT.

Well, it does ... but not in this case because the page is freshly
allocated (which I missed before) so it has no use cache colour yet.

James

> Stop arguing, when you are so wrong.
> 
> kmap() does not create any aliases. For low-memory, it just returns
> the physical address. No alias. And for high memory, there is no
> equivalent low memory address to alias _with_.
> 
> Now, when you actually mix multiple kmap's and you have a virtually
> based cache, then the kmap's obviously need to flush that particular
> page when switching between each other. But that has nothing to do
> with the actual page being kmap'ed, it's entirely an internal issue
> about the particular virtual memory area being re-used. And ARM (and
> any other virtually based CPU) already does that in __kunmap_atomic().
> 
> But notice the case of the low-mem. And understand that you are WRONG
> about the "inequivalent alias" thing.
> 
> So I repeat: this has absolutely *NOTHING* to do with kmap(). Stop blathering.
> 
> It's _purely_ an issue of vm_map_ram(). Nothing else.
> 
>                           Linus


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/