[21/49] orinoco: clear countermeasure setting on commit

[Greg KH]

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: David Kilroy <kilroyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit ba34fcee476d11e7c9df95932787a22a96ff6e68 upstream.

... and interface up.

In these situations, you are usually trying to connect to a new AP, so
keeping TKIP countermeasures active is confusing. This is already how
the driver behaves (inadvertently). However, querying SIOCGIWAUTH may
tell userspace that countermeasures are active when they aren't.

Clear the setting so that the reporting matches what the driver has
done..

Signed-off by: David Kilroy <kilroyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/main.c |    6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/main.c
@@ -1767,6 +1767,12 @@ static int __orinoco_commit(struct orino
 	struct net_device *dev = priv->ndev;
 	int err = 0;
 
+	/* If we've called commit, we are reconfiguring or bringing the
+	 * interface up. Maintaining countermeasures across this would
+	 * be confusing, so note that we've disabled them. The port will
+	 * be enabled later in orinoco_commit or __orinoco_up. */
+	priv->tkip_cm_active = 0;
+
 	err = orinoco_hw_program_rids(priv);
 
 	/* FIXME: what about netif_tx_lock */


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/