Re: [PATCH 7/7] perf: Add load latency monitoring on IntelNehalem/Westmere v2

[Lin Ming]

On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 22:03 +0800, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 12:59 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > 
> > Right, so I think I want this in 3 patches, one adding the load-latency
> > extra reg thing and PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR usage, one adding
> > PERF_SAMPLE_LATENCY and one adding PERF_SAMPLE_EXTRA, I really dislike
> > the LATENCY_DATA name since that ties the extra data to the latency
> > thing, which isn't at all true for other platforms.
> 
> Also, this wants a 4th patch to be fully mergable, we want to have
> tools/perf/ support for these things..

I am thinking what can be added to perf tools....

Seems the average load latency values for each data source and data
linear address is useful.

We may add these support to perf stat or perf record/report.

Any other idea?

data source			average load latency(cycles)
=========			=============================
Unknown L3			xxx
L1-local			xxx
L2-snoop			xxx
....
....
L3-miss,remote,exclusive        xxx
IO                              xxx
Uncached memory                 xxx


data linear address		avergage load latency(cycles)
===================		=============================
xxxxxxx				xxx
xxxxxxx				xxx
xxxxxxx				xxx
....
....

Thanks,
Lin Ming

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/