Re: still nfs problems [Was: Linux 2.6.37-rc8]

[James Bottomley]

On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 12:14 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-06 at 18:05 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > What network DMA operations - what if your NIC doesn't do DMA because
> > it's an SMSC device?
> 
> So this is the danger area ... we might be caught by our own flushing
> tricks.  I can't test this on parisc since all my network drivers use
> DMA (which automatically coheres the kernel mapping by
> flush/invalidate).
> 
> What should happen is that the kernel mapping pages go through the
> ->readdir() path.  Any return from this has to be ready to map the pages
> back to user space, so the kernel alias has to be flushed to make the
> underlying page up to date.
> 
> The exception is pages we haven't yet mapped to userspace.  Here we set
> the PG_dcache_dirty bit (sparc trick) but don't flush the page, since we
> expect the addition of a userspace mapping will detect this case and do
> the flush and clear the bit before the mapping goes live.  I assume
> you're thinking that because this page is allocated and freed internally
> to NFS, it never gets a userspace mapping and therefore, we can return
> from ->readdir() with a dirty kernel cache (and the corresponding flag
> set)?  I think that is a possible hypothesis in certain cases.

OK, so thinking about this, it seems that the only danger is actually
what NFS is doing: reading cache pages via a vmap.  In that case, since
the requirement is to invalidate the vmap range to prepare for read, we
could have invalidate_kernel_vmap_range loop over the underlying pages
and flush them through the kernel alias if the architecture specific
flag indicates their contents might be dirty.

The loop adds expense that is probably largely unnecessary to
invalidate_kernel_vmap_range() but the alternative is adding to the API
proliferation with something that only flushes the kernel pages if the
arch specific flag says they're dirty.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/