Re: [patch 8/8] fs: add i_op->sync_inode

[Nick Piggin]

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:49:11PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:52:31PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > OK I missed that part about not requiring dirty metadata to be written,
> > just currently ongoing async operations. But then I don't understand how
> > it would be used by nfsd, how does nfsd start some async operation on
> > the inode metadata such that ->commit_metadata would do anything useful
> > for it?
> 
> NFSD calls various inode operations (create/mkdir/mknod/link/symlink/
> rename/unlink/rmdir/setattr) and then requires those operations to be
> on disk before completing the request to the client, but it does not
> require other dirty state to be written (data, unlogged size
> or timestamp updates).  Take a look at the XFS implementation: it just
> checks if the inode is still pinned (that is in the in-memory log, but
> not commited to disk) and if so forces the log up to the log buffer
> that contains the last changes to the inode.

OK, I don't exactly see why a sync_inode with appropriate flag could
not solve that problem. I'll take a bit more look through nfs and
xfs. Thanks...

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/