Re: [058/152] tcp: protect sysctl_tcp_cookie_size reads

[Eric Dumazet]

Le jeudi 06 janvier 2011 Ã 23:08 -0500, William Allen Simpson a Ãcrit :
> Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  There's been quite a few
> changes in the 18 months since this function was originally written.
> 
> The overall purpose of the patch seems OK, although most of the patch
> has nothing to do with the purported fix.
> 
> That is, somebody preferred to alter conditions and remove braces.  Seems
> harder to read to me!  I'm surprised that this passed checkpatch.pl?
> 

Hi William, here is somebody talking to you.

This part of the code was exactly what you wrote, with no change.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/40126/

Are you telling us somebody else added bug to your code ?
This is not the case, obviously.

After bug fix and cleanup code looks good, and even checkpatch.pl is
fine with it. No need for useless brackets around "return XXX;"
If I remember well, I did the cleanup so that my patch could not trigger
checkpatch.pl errors/warnings. Not that I am a particular checkpatch
fan, but I know some people are.

By the way, you were CCed when I sent one month ago the mail to
David/netdev. And no reaction from you at that time.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/