Re: [PATCH 1/1] Input: sysrq -- ensure sysrq_enabled and__sysrq_enabled are consistent

[Dmitry Torokhov]

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:06:12PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Currently sysrq_enabled and __sysrq_enabled are initialised separatly
> and inconsitantly, leading to sysrq being actually enabled by reported
> as not enabled in sysfs.  The first change to the sysfs configurable
> synchronises these two:
> 
>     static int __read_mostly sysrq_enabled = 1;
>     static int __sysrq_enabled;
> 
> Add a common define to carry the default for these preventing them becoming
> out of sync again.  Default this to 1 to mirror previous behaviour.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Applied and will also tag for stable. Thank you Andy.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/