[BUG] Generic syscalls -- chmod vs. fchmodat

From: Linas Vepstas
Date: Mon Jan 24 2011 - 14:58:22 EST


Chris, Arnd, all,

Found a bug/incompatibility in the generic syscalls chmod implementation;
not sure if this is a kernel bug or a glibc bug, or how to correctly resolve it.

The new "generic chmod" implementation for glibc sends chmod to the
kernel call sys_fchmodat with AT_FDCWD, instead of using the older
"deprecated" chmod syscall. These two behave slightly differently: with
the new implementation, the file "" (i.e. string of length zero) gets
interpreted
as . and so the syscall succeeds, setting perms on . The old syscall would
return an errno=2 No such file or directory for this filename.

My gut instinct is that this is a kernel bug, but am not so sure; perhaps this
is "working as designed". I thought of submitting a patch to fs/namei.c to
fix this, but then got lost in the details: there didn't seem to be
any particularly
good place to add this check. Meanwhile, a glibc test case (posix/tst-chmod.c)
is failing as a result.

Should we put a check for this funky non-filename into the glibc
generic code, or into sys_chmodat? Recommendations?

--linas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/