Re: questions about arm trustzone

[Dave Martin]

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:45 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:24:13PM +0000, Dave Martin wrote:
>> Avoiding this complexity is one of the motivations for using r7 for
>> the syscall number with CONFIG_EABI (instead of using the SVC comment
>> field).
>
> Your history is not entirely correct.
>
> I had the kernel side of Thumb userspace support in place long before EABI
> came along.  Thumb doesn't have a large enough comment field to store the
> Linux syscall number, so to get around that problem, I decided to use r7
> for the syscall number.  You'll find 2.4 kernels support Thumb instructions
> in userspace.
>
> As part of the EABI switch for ARM mode - which created an incompatible
> SWI interface anyway, we decided that we could reduce data cache pollution
> by eliminating the read of the SWI instruction, so we adopted the r7
> method for ARM EABI mode.
>

Fair enough -- I was glossing over things a bit and I'm not familiar
with all the history.  So, I guess there were plenty of other good
reasons.

Cheers
---Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/