Re: [BUGFIX][PATCH 4/4] memcg: fix khugepaged should skip busymemcg

[Daisuke Nishimura]

On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 12:28:32 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> When using khugepaged with small memory cgroup, we see khugepaged
> causes soft lockup, or running process under memcg will hang
> 
> It's because khugepaged tries to scan all pmd of a process
> which is under busy/small memory cgroup and tries to allocate
> HUGEPAGE size resource.
> 
> This work is done under mmap_sem and can cause memory reclaim
> repeatedly. This will easily raise cpu usage of khugepaged and latecy
> of scanned process will goes up. Moreover, it seems succesfully
> working TransHuge pages may be splitted by this memory reclaim
> caused by khugepaged.
> 
> This patch adds a hint for khugepaged whether a process is
> under a memory cgroup which has sufficient memory. If memcg
> seems busy, a process is skipped.
> 
> How to test:
>   # mount -o cgroup cgroup /cgroup/memory -o memory
>   # mkdir /cgroup/memory/A
>   # echo 200M (or some small) > /cgroup/memory/A/memory.limit_in_bytes
>   # echo 0 > /cgroup/memory/A/tasks
>   # make -j 8 kernel
> 
> Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  include/linux/memcontrol.h |    7 +++++
>  mm/huge_memory.c           |   10 +++++++-
>  mm/memcontrol.c            |   53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: mmotm-0125/mm/memcontrol.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-0125.orig/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ mmotm-0125/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -255,6 +255,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
>  	/* For oom notifier event fd */
>  	struct list_head oom_notify;
>  
> +	/* For transparent hugepage daemon */
> +	unsigned long long recent_failcnt;
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Should we move charges of a task when a task is moved into this
>  	 * mem_cgroup ? And what type of charges should we move ?
> @@ -2214,6 +2217,56 @@ void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct 
>  	tail_pc->flags = head_pc->flags & ~PCGF_NOCOPY_AT_SPLIT;
>  	move_unlock_page_cgroup(head_pc, &flags);
>  }
> +
> +bool mem_cgroup_worth_try_hugepage_scan(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +	struct mem_cgroup *mem;
> +	bool ret = true;
> +	u64 recent_charge_fail;
> +
> +	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
> +		return true;
> +
> +	mem = try_get_mem_cgroup_from_mm(mm);
> +
> +	if (!mem)
> +		return true;
> +
> +	if (mem_cgroup_is_root(mem))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * At collapsing, khugepaged charges HPAGE_SIZE. When it unmap
> +	 * used ptes, the charge will be decreased.
> +	 *
> +	 * This requirement of 'extra charge' at collapsing seems redundant
> +	 * it's safe way for now. For example, at replacing a chunk of page
> +	 * to be hugepage, khuepaged skips pte_none() entry, which is not
> +	 * which is not charged. But we should do charge under spinlocks as
> +	 * pte_lock, we need precharge. Check status before doing heavy
> +	 * jobs and give khugepaged chance to retire early.
> +	 */
> +	if (mem_cgroup_check_margin(mem) >= HPAGE_SIZE)
I'm sorry if I misunderstand, shouldn't it be "<" ?

Thanks,
Daisuke Nishimura.

> +		ret = false;
> +
> +	 /*
> +	  * This is an easy check. If someone other than khugepaged does
> +	  * hit limit, khugepaged should avoid more pressure.
> +	  */
> +	recent_charge_fail = res_counter_read_u64(&mem->res, RES_FAILCNT);
> +	if (ret
> +	    && mem->recent_failcnt
> +            && recent_charge_fail > mem->recent_failcnt) {
> +		ret = false;
> +	}
> +	/* because this thread will fail charge by itself +1.*/
> +	if (recent_charge_fail)
> +		mem->recent_failcnt = recent_charge_fail + 1;
> +out:
> +	css_put(&mem->css);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  #endif
>  
>  /**
> Index: mmotm-0125/mm/huge_memory.c
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-0125.orig/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ mmotm-0125/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -2011,8 +2011,10 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_s
>  	down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
>  	if (unlikely(khugepaged_test_exit(mm)))
>  		vma = NULL;
> -	else
> +	else if (mem_cgroup_worth_try_hugepage_scan(mm))
>  		vma = find_vma(mm, khugepaged_scan.address);
> +	else
> +		vma = NULL;
>  
>  	progress++;
>  	for (; vma; vma = vma->vm_next) {
> @@ -2024,6 +2026,12 @@ static unsigned int khugepaged_scan_mm_s
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> +		if (unlikely(!mem_cgroup_worth_try_hugepage_scan(mm))) {
> +			progress++;
> +			vma = NULL; /* try next mm */
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
>  		if ((!(vma->vm_flags & VM_HUGEPAGE) &&
>  		     !khugepaged_always()) ||
>  		    (vma->vm_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE)) {
> Index: mmotm-0125/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> ===================================================================
> --- mmotm-0125.orig/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> +++ mmotm-0125/include/linux/memcontrol.h
> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ u64 mem_cgroup_get_limit(struct mem_cgro
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
>  void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head, struct page *tail);
> +bool mem_cgroup_worth_try_hugepage_scan(struct mm_struct *mm);
>  #endif
>  
>  #else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR */
> @@ -342,6 +343,12 @@ u64 mem_cgroup_get_limit(struct mem_cgro
>  static inline void mem_cgroup_split_huge_fixup(struct page *head,
>  						struct page *tail)
>  {
> +
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool mem_cgroup_worth_try_hugepage_scan(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +{
> +	return true;
>  }
>  
>  #endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_CONT */
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/