Re: [PATCH 1/2] net/wireless/nl80211.c: Avoid call togenlmsg_cancel
From: Johannes Berg
Date: Fri Jan 28 2011 - 09:01:32 EST
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> index 9b62710..864ddfb 100644
> --- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> +++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
> @@ -2718,7 +2718,7 @@ static int nl80211_get_mesh_config(struct sk_buff *skb,
> hdr = nl80211hdr_put(msg, info->snd_pid, info->snd_seq, 0,
> NL80211_CMD_GET_MESH_CONFIG);
> if (!hdr)
> - goto nla_put_failure;
> + goto out;
> @@ -2954,7 +2955,7 @@ static int nl80211_get_reg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct genl_info *info)
> hdr = nl80211hdr_put(msg, info->snd_pid, info->snd_seq, 0,
> NL80211_CMD_GET_REG);
> if (!hdr)
> - goto nla_put_failure;
> + goto put_failure;
>
> NLA_PUT_STRING(msg, NL80211_ATTR_REG_ALPHA2,
> cfg80211_regdomain->alpha2);
Seems fine. Actually, since the message is freed anyhow, the call to
genlmsg_cancel is *completely* unnecessary, I just put it in to make it
nest better and not rely on it not having side effects.
But why did you call the label differently? :)
johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/