Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] KVM-GST: KVM Steal time accounting

[Avi Kivity]

On 01/28/2011 09:52 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> This patch accounts steal time time in kernel/sched.
> I kept it from last proposal, because I still see advantages
> in it: Doing it here will give us easier access from scheduler
> variables such as the cpu rq. The next patch shows an example of
> usage for it.
>
> Since functions like account_idle_time() can be called from
> multiple places, not only account_process_tick(), steal time
> grabbing is repeated in each account function separatedely.

I accept that steal time is worthwhile, but do you have some way to 
demonstrate that the implementation actually works and is beneficial?

Perhaps run two cpu-bound compute processes on one vcpu, overcommit that 
vcpu, and see what happens to the processing rate with and without steal 
time accounting.  I'd expect a fairer response with steal time accounting.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/