Re: [PATCH 7/7] zram/xvmalloc: combine duplicate block delete code

[Nitin Gupta]

On 01/28/2011 10:01 AM, Robert Jennings wrote:
> This patch eliminates duplicate code.  The remove_block_head function
> is a special case of remove_block which can be contained in remove_block
> without confusion.
>
> The portion of code in remove_block_head which was noted as "DEBUG ONLY"
> is now mandatory.  Doing this provides consistent management of the double
> linked list of blocks under a freelist and makes this consolidation
> of delete block code safe.  The first and last blocks will have NULL
> pointers in their previous and next page pointers respectively.
>
> Additionally, any time a block is removed from a free list the next and
> previous pointers will be set to NULL to avoid misuse outside xvmalloc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Jennings<rcj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The reason for introducing remove_block_head() as a separate function 
was to make malloc slightly faster but since I lack any profiling data, 
I'm not very sure if this may impact performance. Ideally, some sort of 
data with some malloc heavy test would have been useful. Anyways, I 
think major allocator changes will happen when we make xvmalloc 
allocated memory reclaimable, so maybe we can defer profiling.

Acked-by: Nitin Gupta <ngupta@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks,
Nitin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/