Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] arm/dt: probe for platforms via the device tree

[Nicolas Pitre]

On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, Grant Likely wrote:

> If a dtb is passed to the kernel then the kernel needs to iterate
> through compiled-in mdescs looking for one that matches and move the
> dtb data to a safe location before it gets accidentally overwritten by
> the kernel.
> 
> This patch creates a new function, setup_machine_fdt() which is
> analogous to the setup_machine_atags() created in the previous patch.
> It does all the early setup needed to use a device tree machine
> description.  It also creates arm_unflatten_device_tree() which copies
> the dtb into an allocated buffer and unflattens it into the live-tree
> representation.
> 
> v2: Changed to save the dtb by copying into an allocated buffer.
>     - Since the dtb will very likely be passed in the first 16k of ram
>       where the interrupt vectors live, memblock_reserve() is
>       insufficient to protect the dtb data.

This is wrong.  The vector page can be allocated anywhere.  It is 
currently allocated with memblock_alloc(), so if you memblock_reserve() 
the dtb soon enough then it should be safe and the vector page or 
whatever will be allocated somewhere else.

What was the actual problem?


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/