Re: Locking in the clk API, part 2: clk_prepare/clk_unprepare

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:53:44PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:24:58PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:18:46PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > > yeah, didn't thought about multiple consumers, so (as Jeremy suggested)
> > > the right thing is to sleep until CLK_BUSY is cleared.
> > 
> > A simpler way to write this is:
> > 
> > int clk_prepare(struct clk *clk)
> > {
> > 	int ret = 0;
> > 
> > 	mutex_lock(&clk->mutex);
> > 	if (clk->prepared == 0)
> > 		ret = clk->ops->prepare(clk);
> > 	if (ret == 0)
> > 		clk->prepared++;
> > 	mutex_unlock(&clk->mutex);
> > 
> > 	return ret;
> > }
> But you cannot call this in atomic context when you know the clock is
> already prepared.

So?  You're not _supposed_ to call it from any atomic context ever.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/