Re: [PATCH] softirq: Avoid stack switch from ksoftirqd

[Frank Rowand]

On 02/02/11 08:10, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> ksoftirqd() calls do_softirq() which switches stacks on several
> architectures. That makes no sense at all. ksoftirqd's stack is
> sufficient.
> 
> Call __do_softirq() directly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@xxxxxxxxxxx>

> ---
>  kernel/softirq.c |    5 ++++-
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/softirq.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -738,7 +738,10 @@ static int run_ksoftirqd(void * __bind_c
>  			   don't process */
>  			if (cpu_is_offline((long)__bind_cpu))
>  				goto wait_to_die;
> -			do_softirq();
> +			local_irq_disable();
> +			if (local_softirq_pending())
> +				__do_softirq();
> +			local_irq_enable();
>  			preempt_enable_no_resched();
>  			cond_resched();
>  			preempt_disable();
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/