Re: RFC: can we kill the KEEP_SEGMENTS bzImage flag?

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge]

On 02/03/2011 09:19 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>   Bit 6 (write): KEEP_SEGMENTS
>>         Protocol: 2.07+
>>         - If 0, reload the segment registers in the 32bit entry point.
>>         - If 1, do not reload the segment registers in the 32bit entry point.
>>                 Assume that %cs %ds %ss %es are all set to flat segments with
>>                 a base of 0 (or the equivalent for their environment).
> Does anything actually rely on this bit or can we kill it?  I think it
> was added as a crutch for paravirtualization, but I'm being told it is
> not used...

We originally added it with the idea that we might change the Xen boot
sequence to just enter via the normal entrypoint before wandering off to
the Xen paravirt path - mostly as a way of making use of the bzImage's
own decompresser rather than having to have that externally.

But we never ended up doing that, so the paravirt boot path is unused by
Xen, and I don't see that changing.

I think VMI may have used it, but that's moot now.

So I think lguest is the only potential user, and I'm not sure if it
actually does.

    J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/