Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] block: skip elevator data initialization forflush requests

[Vivek Goyal]

On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 02:38:20PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hey, Jens.
> 
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 02:24:42PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 2011-02-02 23:55, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > REQ_SORTED is not set for flush requests because they are never put on
> > > the IO scheduler.
> > 
> > That looks very wrong. REQ_SORTED gets set _when_ the request is sorted
> > into the IO scheduler. This is gross misuse, a bad hack.
> 
> The rationale behind suggesting was that it indicates to the allocator
> that the request may be sorted as how the request will be used is
> communicated using @rw_flags to the allocator.  The patch is buggy
> that the flag actually ends up on the request.  Any better idea how to
> communicate it?

Though you did not like the V1 of patch, personally I also liked just parsing
FLUSH or FUA flag in get_request().

Or how about intoducing a helper function blk_rq_should_init_elevator() 
or something like that and this function will parse FLUSH, FUA flags.

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/