Re: About bittiming calculation result

[Wolfgang Grandegger]

Hi Tomoya,

On 02/08/2011 02:27 AM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 08, 2011 12:53 AM,  Wolfgang Grandegger wrote:
> 
>> BTW, it's always possible to specify optimized bit-timing 
>> parameters directly, e.g. the following seem better:
>>
>>    800000     60  12    4    4   4   3  793650  0.8% 80.0% 81.0%  1.2%
>>
>> You could set these with:
>>
>>   $ ip link set can0 type can \
>>     tq 60 prop-seg 12 phase-seg1 4 phase-seg2 4 sjw 4
> 
> I can confirm 800K comms works well using the above.

Cool, I got these magic values from a CAN hardware expert.

> I wish Can-core could calculate like above.

Me too! I also got some indication on how to improve our algorithm in
case the bit-rate does not match. Hope to find some time soon to work
on this issue.

>>> seg1/seg2/sjw/prop_seg must be more than 1 ?
> BTW, according to EG20T PCH data sheet, 
> CAN bit-timing parameters(BRP, Prop_Seg, Phase_Seg1, Phase_Seg2, SJW) must not be set 0.

OK, then please provide a patch setting tseg1_min to 2.

Wolfgang.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/