Re: [BUG] soft lockup while booting machine with more than 700cores

[David Miller]

From: Jack Steiner <steiner@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:56:48 -0600

> We also noticed that the rebalance_domains() code references many per-cpu
> run queue structures. All of the structures have identical offsets relative
> to the size of a cache leaf. The result is that all index into the same lines in the
> L3 caches. That causes many evictions. We tried an experimental to
> stride the run queues at 128 byte offsets. That helped in some cases but the
> results were mixed.  We are still experimenting with the patch.

I think chasing after cache alignment issues misses the point entirely.

The core issue is that rebalance_domains() is insanely expensive, by
design.  It's complexity is N factorial for the idle non-HZ cpu that is
selected to balance every single domain.

A statistic datastructure that is approximately 128 bytes in size is
repopulated N! times each time this global rebalance thing runs.

I've been seeing rebalance_domains() in my perf top output on 128 cpu
machines for several years now.  Even on an otherwise idle machine,
the system churns in thus code path endlessly.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/