Re: [PATCH] genirq: Call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() insetup_irq().
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Thu Feb 10 2011 - 18:34:04 EST
On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, David Daney wrote:
> irq_chips that supply .irq_bus_lock/.irq_bus_sync_unlock functions,
> expect that the other chip methods will be called inside of calls to
> the pair. If this expectation is not met, things tend to not work.
>
> Make setup_irq() call chip_bus_lock()/chip_bus_sync_unlock() too.
>
> For the vast majority of irq_chips, this will be a NOP as most don't
> have these bus lock functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Ralf,
please pull that change from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git irq/for-mips
so you can apply David's patches which depend on that one.
That's 38-rc4 based w/o any other changes to the core code. I pull
that into irq/core so we have no dependecies or collision for Linus.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/