[patch 10/75] genirq: spurious: Run only one poller at a time
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Thu Feb 10 2011 - 18:36:34 EST
No point in running concurrent pollers which confuse each other by
setting PENDING.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/irq/spurious.c | 16 +++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/irq/spurious.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/irq/spurious.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/irq/spurious.c
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ static int irqfixup __read_mostly;
#define POLL_SPURIOUS_IRQ_INTERVAL (HZ/10)
static void poll_spurious_irqs(unsigned long dummy);
static DEFINE_TIMER(poll_spurious_irq_timer, poll_spurious_irqs, 0, 0);
+static int irq_poll_cpu;
+static atomic_t irq_poll_active;
/*
* Recovery handler for misrouted interrupts.
@@ -92,6 +94,11 @@ static int misrouted_irq(int irq)
struct irq_desc *desc;
int i, ok = 0;
+ if (atomic_inc_return(&irq_poll_active) == 1)
+ goto out;
+
+ irq_poll_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
if (!i)
continue;
@@ -102,6 +109,8 @@ static int misrouted_irq(int irq)
if (try_one_irq(i, desc, false))
ok = 1;
}
+out:
+ atomic_dec(&irq_poll_active);
/* So the caller can adjust the irq error counts */
return ok;
}
@@ -111,6 +120,10 @@ static void poll_spurious_irqs(unsigned
struct irq_desc *desc;
int i;
+ if (atomic_inc_return(&irq_poll_active) != 1)
+ goto out;
+ irq_poll_cpu = smp_processor_id();
+
for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
unsigned int status;
@@ -127,7 +140,8 @@ static void poll_spurious_irqs(unsigned
try_one_irq(i, desc, true);
local_irq_enable();
}
-
+out:
+ atomic_dec(&irq_poll_active);
mod_timer(&poll_spurious_irq_timer,
jiffies + POLL_SPURIOUS_IRQ_INTERVAL);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/