Re: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration
From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Mon Feb 14 2011 - 13:14:20 EST
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 8:22 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 08:17:46AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> why not do it at first point ?
>>
>> numa_register_meminfo() should only take care of creating correctly
>> struct numa_meminfo.
>
> No, register meminfo doesn't create numa_meminfo. It sets up system
> states according to the configuration information in numa_meminfo, and
> I really have no idea what you're arguing for or against. What's your
> point?
I just want seperate setup_bootmem ( and maybe init_memory_mapping_high...)
out that __register__ function.
that __register__ function do some sth like memblock_register to
early_node_map[]
looks reasonable.
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/