Re: [PATCH 0/2] jump label: 2.6.38 updates

[Mathieu Desnoyers]

* Peter Zijlstra (peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-02-14 at 13:54 -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> 
> > I don't need an atomic_read() in the disabled case for dynamic debug,
> > and I would be ok, #ifdef CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL, in dynamic_debug.h. Its not
> > the prettiest solution. But I can certainly live with it for now, so
> > that we can sort out the atomic_read() issue independently.
> > 
> > Peter, Mathieu, are you guys ok with this?
> 
> Yeah, lets see where that gets us.
> 

Works for me as long as you put a nice witty comment around this
disgusting hack (something related to "include Hell", where bad
programmers go after they die). ;-)

Thanks,

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/