[111/115] sched: Fix volanomark performance regression
From: Greg KH
Date: Tue Feb 15 2011 - 20:53:26 EST
2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
Commit: b5482cfa1c95a188b3054fa33274806add91bbe5 upstream
Commit fab4762 triggers excessive idle balancing, causing a ~30% loss in
volanomark throughput. Remove idle balancing throttle reset.
Originally-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Nikhil Rao <ncrao@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
LKML-Reference: <1289928732.5169.211.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -3326,10 +3326,6 @@ static void pull_task(struct rq *src_rq,
set_task_cpu(p, this_cpu);
activate_task(this_rq, p, 0);
check_preempt_curr(this_rq, p, 0);
-
- /* re-arm NEWIDLE balancing when moving tasks */
- src_rq->avg_idle = this_rq->avg_idle = 2*sysctl_sched_migration_cost;
- this_rq->idle_stamp = 0;
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/