Re: [PATCH 00/14] [GIT PULL][v2.6.39] tracing/filter: More robustfiltering

[Ingo Molnar]

* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Let me apologize again. [...]

No need to apologize - you raised valid questions that have come up in the past and 
i am pretty good at ignoring early-in-the-morning aspect of mails ;-)

> > Anyway, there's certainly encouraging responses in this thread so i'm hopeful 
> > that it's getting fixed and improved and we can push the generic bits upstream.
> 
> Yes, I'm hopeful too ;)

Great! :-)

If someone wants to dust off the 'trace' utility patches that are still in 
tip:tmp.perf/trace that would be fantastic. Thomas and Peter prototyped an 
ftrace-esque buffering model there, to have all events associated with a
single fd (and hence a single [per cpu] buffer).

Warning, they conflict left and right with the current code:

 kernel/sched.c
 kernel/trace/trace.c
 tools/perf/Makefile
 tools/perf/builtin-record.c
 tools/perf/util/event.c
 tools/perf/util/header.c
 tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
 tools/perf/util/session.c
 tools/perf/util/session.h

So it's quite a bit of work - and of course it was all very unfinished, not even 
reaching prototype stage really.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/