Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpuset: Hold callback_mutex in cpuset_clone()
From: Paul Menage
Date: Thu Feb 17 2011 - 18:52:18 EST
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 5:50 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chaning cpuset->mems/cpuset->cpus should be protected under
> callback_mutex.
>
> cpuset_clone() doesn't follow this rule. It's ok because it's
> called when creating and initializing a cgroup, but we'd better
> hold the lock to avoid subtil break in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Paul Menage <menage@xxxxxxxxxx>
Patch title should be s/cpuset_clone/cpuset_post_clone/
> ---
> kernel/cpuset.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
> index 1e18d26..445573b 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -1840,8 +1840,10 @@ static void cpuset_post_clone(struct cgroup_subsys *ss,
> cs = cgroup_cs(cgroup);
> parent_cs = cgroup_cs(parent);
>
> + mutex_lock(&callback_mutex);
> cs->mems_allowed = parent_cs->mems_allowed;
> cpumask_copy(cs->cpus_allowed, parent_cs->cpus_allowed);
> + mutex_unlock(&callback_mutex);
> return;
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.3.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/