Re: [PATCH] net: Add default_advmss() methods to blackhole dst_ops
From: Changli Gao
Date: Fri Feb 18 2011 - 08:17:12 EST
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> I suspect following patch is needed
>
> CC Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> because he fixed the
> default_mtu problem in commit ec831ea72ee5d7d47
> (net: Add default_mtu() methods to blackhole dst_ops)
>
> Thanks !
>
> [PATCH] net: Add default_advmss() methods to blackhole dst_ops
>
> Commit 0dbaee3b37e118a (net: Abstract default ADVMSS behind an
> accessor.) introduced a possible crash in tcp_connect_init(), when
> dst->default_advmss() is called from dst_metric_advmss()
>
> Reported-by: George Spelvin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@xxxxxxxxx>
> CC: Roland Dreier <roland@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/ipv4/route.c | 7 +++++++
> net/ipv6/route.c | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
> index 788a3e7..5edb605 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
> @@ -2712,6 +2712,12 @@ static unsigned int ipv4_blackhole_default_mtu(const struct dst_entry *dst)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static unsigned int ipv4_blackhole_default_advmss(const struct dst_entry *dst)
> +{
> + return 256;
> +}
> +
> +
I am wondering why magic number 256 is used here. Is there a special
reason? Thanks.
--
Regards,
Changli Gao(xiaosuo@xxxxxxxxx)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/