Re: merge of m68knommu and m68k arch branches?

[Geert Uytterhoeven]

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 23:12, Greg Ungerer <gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 19/02/11 01:24, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:27, Geert Uytterhoeven<geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Âwrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 01:07, Greg Ungerer<gerg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Âwrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would like to put up for discussion a merge of the m68knommu and
>>>> m68k arch branches.
>>>>
>>>> Attached is a script and patch that does a kind of brute force
>>>> simplistic merge of the directories and files. (Thanks to Stephen King
>>>> <sfking@xxxxxxxxx> Âfor the initial version of this script, and to
>>>> Sam Ravnborg for the m68k includes merge script this was based on).
>>>> Nothing outside of the arch/m68k and arch/m68knommu directories is
>>>> touched, and in the end there is no more arch/m68knommu. To apply you
>>>> simply run the script from the top of a current kernel git tree (I used
>>>> 2.6.38-rc5 for testing) and then apply the patch.
>>>
>>> Building...
>>
>> Builds fine (all test configs), runs on ARAnyM.
>>
>> Let's go ahead?
>
> What sort of timing do you think makes sense?
> Is for 2.6.39 too soon?

Personally, I don't mind. 2.6.39 is OK for me. I guess the safest way
is to let Linus
execute the script? Before or after the merge window?

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

            Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
             Â Â -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/