Re: [PATCH]: Staging: hv: Allocate the vmbus irq dynamically

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> -/* FIXME! We need to do this dynamically for PIC and APIC system */
> -#define VMBUS_IRQ		0x5
> -#define VMBUS_IRQ_VECTOR	IRQ5_VECTOR
> +static int vmbus_irq;
>  
>  /* Main vmbus driver data structure */
>  struct vmbus_driver_context {
> @@ -57,6 +55,27 @@ struct vmbus_driver_context {
>  	struct vm_device device_ctx;
>  };
>  
> +/*
> + * Find an un-used IRQ that the VMBUS can use. If none is available;
> + * return -EBUSY.
> + */
> +static int vmbus_get_irq(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned int avail_irq_mask;
> +	int irq = -EBUSY;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Pick the first unused interrupt. HyperV can
> +	 * interrupt us on any interrupt line we specify.
> +	 */
> +
> +	avail_irq_mask = probe_irq_on();
> +	if (avail_irq_mask != 0)
> +		irq = ffs(avail_irq_mask);
> +	probe_irq_off(avail_irq_mask);
> +	return irq;


Please do not use probe_irq_on for dynamic irq allocation. Highjacking
the lower PIC irqs is really not a good idea. Depending on when this
runs, you might grab an irq required by a driver which gets loaded
later. 

Could you please explain what you're trying to do here ?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/