Re: [PATCH 1/3] module: deal with alignment issues in built-in module versions

[Linus Torvalds]

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That's probably just a legacy from when I combined the linkscripts
> for the two architectures. If I remember correctly, RODATA brings
> in RO_DATA_SECTION which in turn brings in __param and __modver
> for both architectures. CRISv32 then duplicates the __param stuff
> for some historical reason.

Hmm. This makes it sound like the patch should be to remove the
__param thing rather than to add the _modver thing. And I can
definitely confirm that cris seems to use RODATA, which brings in the
RO_DATA_SECTION() thing with proper page alignment.

But:

> True, at least until I've made sure that there isn't any
> underlying reason for CRISv32 to put __param in a different place...
>
> Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@xxxxxxxx>

I really am not going to apply a patch that likely just adds another
redundant field to the linker scripts. So the ack I'm just ignoring,

But it would be good to get the "remove the legacy __param thing
because it's already there from the asm-generic version" confirmed by
testing, and not just looking at the source code.

                     Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/