Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Weight-balanced tree

[Alex Williamson]

On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 19:08 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/23/2011 07:02 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > >
> > >  obj-$(CONFIG_WEIGHT_BALANCED_TREE) += wbtree.o
> > >
> > >  then kvm can select it, and the impact on non-kvm kernels is removed.
> >
> > Then we'd have issues trying to build an external kvm module for a
> > pre-existing non-kvm kernel.  Do we care?
> 
> Officially, no.
> 
> What we typically do in these cases is copy the code into the kvm-kmod 
> compatibility layer and compile it if the kernel doesn't supply it (like 
> all older kernels regardless of config).
> 
> > If we were to take such a
> > path, I think the default should be on, kvm would depend on it, but we
> > could add an option to disable it for EMBEDDED/EXPERT.  Thanks,
> 
> That would work as well.

In retrospect, I suppose it doesn't really make sense to have it
compiled in "just in case".  I'll follow your first suggestion.  Thanks,

Alex

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/