Re: [PATCH 2/2] Define ENONAMESERVICE and ENAMEUNKNOWN to indicate name service errors

[David Howells]

Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I was wondering if at least there was some co-ordination going on so that
> functions like perror() produced sensible answers. Otherwise it's
> debatable if its actually an improvement for the poor end user ?

Fair point.  That's why I cc'd the messages to linux-api@, but I'm not sure who
actually reads it, besides Michael Kerrisk.  I guess it's probably a good idea
to wave my suggestions on the glibc list at least.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/