Re: [PATCH 14/14] xen: events: propagate irq allocation failureinstead of panicking

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 05:41:26PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> Running out of IRQs need not be fatal to the machine as a whole.

Do the backends/frontends deal with this appropiately?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/xen/events.c |   22 ++++++++++++++--------
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c b/drivers/xen/events.c
> index 51c6a5b..c6f2a2e 100644
> --- a/drivers/xen/events.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/events.c
> @@ -406,7 +406,7 @@ static void xen_irq_init(unsigned irq)
>  	list_add_tail(&info->list, &xen_irq_list_head);
>  }
>  
> -static int xen_allocate_irq_dynamic(void)
> +static int __must_check xen_allocate_irq_dynamic(void)

What is the '__must_check' for?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/