Re: [PATCH/v2] mm/memblock: Properly handle overlaps and fix errorpath

[Ingo Molnar]

* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 12:41 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > > Hopefully not damaged with a spurious bit of email header this
> > > time around... sorry about that.
> > 
> > works on my setups...
> > 
> > [    0.000000] Subtract (26 early reservations)
> > [    0.000000]   [000009a000-000009efff]
> > [    0.000000]   [000009f400-00000fffff]
> > [    0.000000]   [0001000000-0003495048]
> > ...
> > before:
> > [    0.000000] Subtract (27 early reservations)
> > [    0.000000]   [000009a000-000009efff]
> > [    0.000000]   [000009f400-00000fffff]
> > [    0.000000]   [00000f85b0-00000f86b3]
> > [    0.000000]   [0001000000-0003495048] 
> 
> Ah interesting, so you did have a case of overlap that wasn't properly
> handled as well.
> 
> If there is no objection, I'll queue that up in powerpc-next for the
> upcoming merge window (soon now).

I think it would be better to do it via -mm, as x86 and other architectures are now 
affected by memblock changes as well.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/