Re: [PATCH trace-cmd 3/3] Revert "trace-cmd: Use conditionalassignment of CC and AR"

[Steven Rostedt]

On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 09:50 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> 
> On 03/10/2011 05:11 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-03-09 at 22:43 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> >
> >>> I don't know the answers, but if we take the kernel Makefile as a
> >>> template, then setting CC doesn't work.
> >>
> >> The kernel is a bit special I believe as it is pretty tied to gcc. Is
> >> trace-cmd tied to gcc to such a degree that we want to make it difficult
> >> for people to try different compilers?
> >
> > True, trace-cmd is tied more to glibc (special features) than gcc.
> >
> > I just looked at the Makefile for evolution, and it has:
> >
> > CC = gcc
> >
> > So it is not limited to just the kernel.
> 
> I think we're down to a subjective argument over "correctness".

No no no don't stop! I love having subjective arguments over
"correctness"! ;)


>  Any of 
> the resent proposals will work for me.

OK, personally, I like the last one, even if it is an overkill of
Makefile obfuscation.

David, could you post that last change. I'll add a patch on top
commenting the reason for it, and how Makefile's suck ;)

-- Steve



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/