Re: [PATCH 0/2] jump label: update for .39

[David Daney]

On 03/10/2011 01:42 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-10 at 16:22 -0500, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > > Anyway, I think the best thing for now is to have Jason add
> > > the .align(sizeof(long)) in the inline assembly for all locations and be
> > > done with it.
> >
> > You seem to be contradicting yourself here. I'm concerned about having
> > "structures" of a size not power of two. Can we simply either
>
> But we don't have structures. We have data that has been allocated in
> assembly. Come to think of it, it may be best to keep these as
> ".align 4".
>
>
> > - Add a padding element at the end
> > or
> > - use .align 4*sizeof(long) at the beginning
> >
> > to make sure the linker won't put any holes when it puts objects
> > together ?
>
> The linker should be dumb and not trying to "optimize", because it has
> no idea what the content is. If anything, it should try to compact
> things as best as possible, with the exception of keeping things
> naturally word aligned. If you added even ".align(4)" on a 64bit system,
> the linker should be trying to keep everything packed.
>
> If I get time, I could look at the linker code to see exactly what it
> does, but adding holes into sections that are naturally word align seems
> more like a bug in the linker than a problem that we need to deal with.
>
> The only issue I could fathom, is if gcc added its own padding in a
> section. That is, when it created the __jump_table section with one
> element, it added another 4/8 bytes to make the section size a power of
> two. Maybe that is a true issue, maybe not. It would seems stupid to do
> so IMHO, because when you get to bigger numbers, the aligning a power of
> 2 can get much bigger. But perhaps it does it for small power of 2s?

GCC on x86_64 likes to align its data with .align 16:
-------------------------------
$ cat jl.c

struct foo {
  long a;
  long b;
  long c;
};

struct foo bar = {1,2,3};

$ gcc -O3 -S jl.c
$ cat jl.s
	.file	"jl.c"
.globl bar
	.data
	.align 16
	.type	bar, @object
	.size	bar, 24
bar:
	.quad	1
	.quad	2
	.quad	3
	.ident	"GCC: (GNU) 4.4.4 20100630 (Red Hat 4.4.4-10)"
	.section	.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
----------------------------------

But that shouldn't matter because we only emit data to the __jump_table 
section from asm().

GCC is getting a reference to that table (array of structures really) 
from a global variable, I don't see how it can violate the ABI in this case.


David Daney
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/