Re: NFS regression in 2.6.37.1 (current stable)

[Dr Andrew John Hughes]

On 20:44 Thu 10 Mar     , Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 03/10/2011 08:35 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> [...]
> > There's some more discussion here:
> > 
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357121
> 
> They have identified the 55ea499d60aefa3d03a77fc8590c26b5881faa92 as the
> offending commit, too. Used system is x86_64.
> 

FWIW, that 'they' is me too; I reported it there first, but decided to bring
the discussion to the kernel lists when things didn't seem to be progressing
at the distro level.

> > Greg, Trond, as this is a regression in -stable, I wonder if it's best
> > that we just revert the commit?
> 
> No - that would break arm < armv6 and IIRC parisc.
> 
> Marc
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
> Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
> Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |
> 



-- 
Andrew :)

Free Java Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/