RE: [PATCH 13/21] [PATCH 13/21] Staging: hv: Renamevmbus_driver_context structure

[KY Srinivasan]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 5:50 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: gregkh@xxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Haiyang Zhang; Mike
> Sterling; Abhishek Kane (Mindtree Consulting PVT LTD); Hank Janssen
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/21] [PATCH 13/21] Staging: hv: Rename
> vmbus_driver_context structure
> 
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> > Now that struct vmbus_driver_context is properly
> > cleaned up, rename this structure appropriately and
> > cleanup the code.
> 
> > @@ -877,10 +873,10 @@ static irqreturn_t vmbus_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> >  	/* Schedules a dpc if necessary */
> >  	if (ret > 0) {
> >  		if (test_bit(0, (unsigned long *)&ret))
> > -			tasklet_schedule(&vmbus_drv.msg_dpc);
> > +			tasklet_schedule(&hv_bus.msg_dpc);
> >
> >  		if (test_bit(1, (unsigned long *)&ret))
> > -			tasklet_schedule(&vmbus_drv.event_dpc);
> > +			tasklet_schedule(&hv_bus.event_dpc);
> 
> What's the plan to convert that tasklet/work stuff to threaded irqs ?


This is on my plate; I was going to work on this after I addressed all other issues 
preventing the vmbus driver from exiting staging.

Regards,

K. Y 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/