Re: [PATCH 1/2] tty: serial: Fix build on architecture that does nothave ioport

From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Date: Fri Mar 11 2011 - 07:57:53 EST


Hi,

Thanks for your comment!

2011/3/11 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>:
> On Friday 11 March 2011 06:54:56 Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
>> Some CPU's do not have ioport. Therefore, these do not have inX/outX.
>> Because they define CONFIG_NO_IOPORT, These CPU's use this and do not
>> use inX/outX.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro.iwamatsu.yj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I like this patch, I had played with something similar before
> but never got it to the state where I was happy with submitting
> it. I'd really like to get us to the point where platforms without
> PCI support do don't need to define inb/outb and can still
> use all other drivers.
>
> There are two small improvements that I would like to suggest
> to this patch:
>
> * use #ifdef CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_HUB6 to configure out hub6 support.
>  It's already disabled on most systems, so we can save a bit
>  binary code without making the driver uglier.
>

OK.

> * Introduce a new CONFIG_SERIAL_8250_IOPORT symbol and make
>  the normal io_serial_* code depend on that. It can be a silent
>  Kconfig symbol that automatically gets selected in the appropriate
>  cases. I find this clearer than the double negation in "not no ioport".
>  The code that is used in both HUB6 and regular cases can be under
>  this symbol.
>

Yes, you are right. I will send new patch.

Thanks!

Nobuhiro

--
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/